May We Never Stifle Progress

AWAKENING on

May We Never Stifle Progress

3 Min Read

Nobody invented Alcoholics Anonymous. It grew. Trial-and-error has produced a rich experience. Little by little we have been adopting the lessons of that experience, first as policy and then as tradition. That process still goes on and we hope it never stops. Should we ever harden too much, the letter might crush that spirit. We could victimize ourselves by petty rules and prohibitions; we could imagine that we had said the last word. We might even be asking alcoholics to accept our rigid ideas or stay away. May we never stifle progress like that! 
— Bill W., Foreword to AA Tradition: How It Developed(1955; originally published in AA Grapevine, 1946)

By 1944, AA had grown to over 10,000 members in more than 300 groups. Letters kept arriving at the New York office—hundreds of them, full of questions and conflicts. Bill W. called it a “welter of exciting and fearsome experience.” The Traditions did not come from theory. They came from crises that forced hard choices.

In 1936, Towns Hospital offered Bill a paid position as a lay therapist. After years of poverty, he desperately wanted it. He brought the question to the New York group. They said no—you can’t be paid to do Twelfth Step work. A year later, Bill’s New York group left the Oxford Group, the Christian fellowship where AA had been born. The break was painful but necessary: AA needed democracy and a single focus. In 1942, Clarence S. discovered that Bill and Dr. Bob were receiving royalties from Big Book sales. The controversy spread through Cleveland—it looked like hypocrisy. Father Ed Dowling helped draw a distinction that would prove essential: you can’t accept money for carrying the message, but royalties for writing a book are compensation for special services.

Then history offered a warning. In July 1945, the Grapevine published an article about the Washingtonians—a nineteenth-century fellowship of drunks helping drunks that had gathered 600,000 members in three years and collapsed within five. Politicians hijacked their platform. Speakers competed for fame. Groups fractured over slavery and abolition. AA members who read the article were startled, then sobered. AA was already making some of the same mistakes.

In 1946, Marty Mann’s fundraising letter for the National Council on Alcoholism carried Bill and Dr. Bob’s names on the letterhead—it looked like AA was endorsing an outside organization. The Alcoholic Foundation had to publish a disavowal. These experiences, and hundreds more, shaped what Bill published that April: the long form of the Twelve Traditions. What made them remarkable was what they refused to do—create a hierarchy, take positions, chase money, or let anyone become the face of the fellowship.

The Traditions don’t govern. They protect us from personality cults, from division, from the corruption of power. And at the foundation lies anonymity—not as hiding, but as humility. Recovery is not a brand to be marketed. It is a gift to be passed on.

In a world of influencer culture and monetized wellness, the Traditions stand apart. But Bill’s warning still echoes. The same protectiveness that keeps a fellowship alive can calcify into rigidity. We can mistake our familiar ways for the only ways, and forget that the Traditions themselves emerged from willingness to change. Each generation inherits not just the Traditions but the responsibility to keep them alive—to protect what matters while leaving room for change and what we cannot yet imagine.

What Tradition do I most resist, and what might that resistance reveal?

Where in my recovery have I been tempted to make it about me rather than the message?

Am I holding any principle so rigidly that the letter is crushing the spirit?

How do I carry the lessons of those who came before into my own service today?