Our Common Welfare

AWAKENING on

Our Common Welfare

3 Min Read

“Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.”
James Baldwin, “As Much Truth As One Can Bear,” The New York Times (1962)

James Baldwin was an American writer and civil rights activist known for his unflinching truth-telling about identity, injustice, and human transformation. In this essay, he reminds us that change begins with honest confrontation. Recovery is no different: if we can’t name harm, we can’t heal from it.

We came to recovery broken, desperate, sometimes still carrying behaviors that made us unsafe to ourselves and others. We needed rooms where we could be honest without fear of judgment—and for that belonging to mean anything, we needed to feel safe enough to tell the truth. But safety doesn’t happen just because we want it to—it’s created through clarity, courage, and collective care.

12-Step groups are not separate from the world—they are a cross-section of it. The same problems that exist outside walk through our doors: predatory behavior, harassment, discrimination, the impulse to dominate. At first, some of us believed that “love and tolerance” meant ignoring harm. Over time, we learned that protecting each other is part of love. Real tolerance has limits. Silence when someone is being harmed isn’t loving—it’s abandoning the vulnerable.

Tradition One tells us that our common welfare comes first. Not because individuals don’t matter, but because recovery can’t flourish where people feel unsafe. When harmful behavior persists, people leave—not just meetings, but sometimes recovery itself. We can’t get better in a room where we’re watching our backs.

This is the paradox at the heart of safety in our context: we practice deep inclusion while maintaining necessary boundaries. The safety literature makes clear that anonymity is not a shield for abuse or criminal conduct. Contacting authorities doesn’t violate our Traditions—it upholds them. Groups have the right to ask disruptive individuals to leave a meeting, not to exclude them from the fellowship, but to protect the group’s ability to fulfill its primary purpose: carrying the message to those who still suffer.

Safety doesn’t require us to be perfect, it simply requires action. It looks like trusted servants speaking up when behavior crosses a line. It means talking about safety before problems escalate. It means showing newcomers that they don’t have to endure unwanted attention to stay in recovery. It means long-timers modeling that love and tolerance include protecting those who can’t yet protect themselves.

To truly belong, we must create spaces where difficult realities can be spoken and heard without fear. A safe community isn’t one without conflict, but one where harm is acknowledged and addressed, where boundaries arise from respect rather than rigid rules, where every voice—especially the vulnerable—is protected by the strength of the whole.

How does my group communicate what behavior supports safety, and what undermines it? 

When have I avoided speaking up to “keep the peace”? 

How can I help foster safety without taking control? 

What conversations need to happen now—before they’re forced on us?